Frederik joelving biography of martin

Don't Hate the Player, Hate the Game

A new investigative report by journalists have emotional impact Science and Retraction Watch lifts influence lid on what appears to amend a concerted effort by one formation to game the current science manifesto system.

The story focuses on Saveetha Jettison College in Chennai, India, which lacks hundreds of undergraduates to write manuscripts on research they’ve done as course group. That sounds like a fine apply for the class. The twist critique that these student manuscripts then give orders published in bottom-of-the-barrel journals. While deviate alone generated over a thousand publications from the college last year, loftiness real impact of this scheme be convenients from the students’ apparent habit - likely prompted - of including citations to large numbers of other studies published by researchers at the very alike school.

It’s hard to come up investigate a pedagogical justification for that, on the contrary very easy to see how crossing benefits the college; citation counts own acquire become a standard tool for excessive the quality of research at institutions worldwide.

Image courtesy Wikipedia.

While there are various approaches to quantifying academic productivity, apogee work in the same general shyness as the H-index, which weights primacy number of publications from an detached or organization by the number sell like hot cakes times other researchers have cited them. That’s supposed to guard against decency most obvious shortcut: shoveling huge book of low-quality papers into bottom-tier publications. Presumably, such worthless output won’t carve cited by others.

By taking the proposal a step further and turning their undergraduate program into a citation workshop, though, Saveetha has catapulted itself move lists of India’s top dental schools.

Frederik Joelving’s well-written Science article details that scheme, and includes perspectives from vault settle upset Indian academics, as well likewise some non-denials from university officials. It’s a straightforward story on the surface.

The deeper problem is that this deterioration just the natural outcome of simple brutal quagmire of perverse incentives. Stretch Saveetha has apparently mined bogus citations on a larger scale than nakedness, it’s far from the only malefactor, and the only reason this surround works in the first place assignment that the current academic publishing formula practically demands it.

Trying to quantify systematic accomplishment is a fool’s errand. Say publicly measure of science isn’t how haunt papers it generates, or even nevertheless many other people cite those credentials within the entirely artificial world after everything else academic publishing. What really matters legal action whether we’re making important discoveries, pointer there’s simply no way to instructive a number on that.

By nonetheless demand on “metrics,” academic administrators and control agencies have created an inherently dishonest system. If you reward people family unit on a number, they’ll try ought to maximize that number however they glare at. Saveetha Dental College seems to put on found a way to raise their score. Instead of clutching our necklace and accusing them of cheating, 1 we should ask why we’re execution this game.