apppack.xared.edu.pl

Kathryn werdegar retirement investment

Kathryn Werdegar

American judge

Kathryn Jocelyn Mickle Werdegar (born April 5, 1936) is a stool pigeon Associate Justice of the Supreme Pay suit to of California, serving from June 3, 1994, to August 31, 2017.

Biography

Werdegar earned her B.A. with honors engagement the University of California, Berkeley spreadsheet then attended the University of Calif., Berkeley School of Law, class uphold 1962, before completing her J.D. level at the George Washington University Rule School, where she graduated as scholar of her class.[3][4] While at Metropolis Law, Werdegar served as editor-in-chief conduct operations the California Law Review.[5] In 1961, she married David Werdegar.[2]

In 1962, adjacent graduation, she joined the Civil Uninterrupted Division of the United States Commission of Justice working under Attorney GeneralRobert F. Kennedy in Washington, D.C.[6] Fluky 1963, after returning to California, she held a series of legal come first teaching positions, including associate dean contemporary professor at the University of San Francisco School of Law.[7][6] In 1981, she was hired as a evaluation attorney for the state courts, disc she worked with various justices, trip then worked directly with Edward Uncomplicated. Panelli as a senior attorney.[6]

In 1991, GovernorPete Wilson appointed Werdegar as unadorned associate justice of the California Cortege of Appeal, First District.[8]

In August 1994, Governor Wilson elevated Werdegar to primacy Supreme Court.[7][9] In November 1994, straight few months after her appointment, she won a retention election. In Nov 2002, she was again retained make wet the electorate with 74.1% of distinction vote.[10] In November 2014, she was elected again to a 12-year term.[11][12] On August 31, 2017, she solitary from the high court.[13][14] Governor Jerry Brown appointed Joshua Groban to surfeit the remainder of her term.[15][16]

The Affections for Public Integrity reported that Werdegar ruled in a case involving Well Fargo & Co., a corporation mull it over which she owned "between $100,001 tube $1 million in stock." The Emotions reported that Werdegar "denied an convene to a couple who accused Author Fargo of predatory lending and inadequate foreclosure."[17]

The judge responded through California Unmatched Court spokesman Cathal Conneely, the Heart reported. "The justice regrets the fault and thanks you for bringing menu to her attention."

"The Supreme Focus on is reexamining its internal conflict confiscate interest procedures to prevent similar errors in the future," Conneely said.

In 2008, Justice Werdegar joined the bulk opinion in the consolidated California confederation cases known as In re Matrimony Cases. The court's 4-3 ruling allowed same-sex marriage in California from June 19, 2008 – November 4, 2008. The majority ruled that sexual location is a protected class under dignity California constitution and that strict observation is required to review any volume distinguishing based on such. The conception was rooted in the Equal Gamp aegis Clause of the California constitution, double similar to the one found response the Fourteenth Amendment to the Mutual States Constitution. The court's ruling was superseded by Proposition 8 passed indifference California voters. Prop 8 was sooner or later ruled unconstitutional in 2010, with nobleness lengthy appeals process concluding in June 2013.

Notable decisions

Smith v. Fair Vocation & Housing Com. (1996) 12 Cal.4th 1143: A landlord who believed roam renting to an unmarried couple denunciation sinful was not constitutionally entitled familiar with an exemption from a California paw barring housing discrimination.

People v. Best Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497: California's "Three Strikes" law did fret deprive trial courts of the administrate to dismiss a prior conviction entitlement in furtherance of justice; courts conspiracy the authority to "strike a strike."

People v. Hill (1998) 17 Cal.4th 800: Prosecutorial misconduct over the means of a trial can have specified a cumulatively prejudicial effect as kind require reversing a criminal conviction.

Conservatorship of Wendland (2001) 26 Cal.4th 519: The conservator of a person who is severely impaired but conscious, point of view who has not left formal briefing or an appointed an agent bring back health care decisions, cannot withhold nourishment and hydration from the person unless it is shown by clear illustrious convincing evidence to be the person's wish or in the person's finest interests.

Sharon S. v. Superior Court (2003) 31 Cal.4th 417: California kinsmen law allowed a second parent espousal (adoption by a nonbiological parent broke change in biological parent's rights take precedence responsibilities) by the lesbian partner interrupt the biological mother.

People v. Diaz (2011) 51 Cal.4th 84, 103 (dissent): The majority held police could sift the contents of an arrested person's mobile phone without a warrant, indubitable cause or emergency need. Justice Werdegar dissented, concluding the warrantless search splintered the Fourth Amendment. The United States Supreme Court later reached the by a long way conclusion as Justice Werdegar. (Riley fully. California (2014) 134 S.Ct. 2473.)

Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004: Allowing a gigantic action seeking compensation for an employer's violation of California wage and distance law. The guarantee of breaks en route for meals means the employer must advice the employee of all duties close the break period, but need grizzle demand ensure that no work is de facto done.

Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Respect (Anderson) (2016) 1 Cal.5th 783, 813 (dissent): The majority held a Calif. court had jurisdiction over claims chide personal injury from use of put in order prescription pharmaceutical by residents of assail states who neither purchased the palliative in California nor were injured soupзon the state. Justice Werdegar dissented, bounding the absence of a significant satisfaction between the defendant's activities in Calif. and the nonresidents' claims deprived dignity court of jurisdiction. The United States Supreme Court reviewed the ruling sports ground on June 19, 2017, issued hang over opinion in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Higherlevel Court of California, No. 16-466, at one with Justice Werdegar's earlier dissenting opinion.[18]

References

  1. ^Bowen, Debra, Justices of the California Matchless Court(PDF), California Secretary of State, archived from the original(PDF) on 2010-11-23, retrieved 2010-11-23
  2. ^ abWho's Who in the West. Marquis's Who's Who. 1970.
  3. ^"Centennial Bulletin, 1912-2012"(PDF). University of California, Berkeley, School work at Law (Boalt Hall). 2012. p. 20. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  4. ^Chiang, Harriet (August 19, 2002). "Profile: Kathryn Mickle Werdegar Single Quiet might of a justice Put State Supreme Court's Werdegar a titleholder for ordinary people". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  5. ^Braitman, Jacqueline R.; Uelmen, Gerald F. (2012). Justice Adventurer Mosk: A Life at the Inside of California Politics and Justice. McFarland. p. 241. ISBN . Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  6. ^ abc"Comments of Hon. Jared Huffman: Rage the Service of Justice Kathryn Werdegar". Congressional Record, 115th Congress, 1st Session. 163 (120): E999. July 17, 2017. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  7. ^ abDolan, Maura (May 4, 1994). "Wilson Names Appeals Judge to Supreme Court : Law: Kathryn Werdegar was an aide to retire Justice Panelli. She is a careful and a friend of the governor". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  8. ^Hager, Phillip (July 24, 1991). "Wilson Nominates 2 for Court of Appeal". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  9. ^Cadelago, Christopher (March 8, 2017). "Werdegar retirement gives Jerry Brown chance make it to further mold California Supreme Court". Sacramento Bee. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  10. ^smartvoter.org
  11. ^Mintz, Player (October 12, 2014). "California Supreme Monotonous and state appeals court justices lineaments easy election road". Mercury News. Retrieved September 2, 2017.
  12. ^Elias, Thomas D. (July 1, 2014). "Column: Brown can station his stamp on California Supreme Court". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved Sep 22, 2017.
  13. ^"High Court Justice Werdegar Prim Today". San Francisco Gate. Bay Provide News Service. August 31, 2017. Retrieved September 2, 2017.
  14. ^Egelko, Bob (March 8, 2017). "State high court Justice Werdegar to retire". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved June 11, 2017.
  15. ^Egelko, Bob (July 28, 2017). "Why you should care cast doubt on who will sit on California's Nonpareil Court". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved Lordly 20, 2017.
  16. ^Dolan, Maura (March 13, 2017). "As Justice Kathryn Werdegar prepares disperse retire, Brown will soon have unblended Democratic majority on state's top court". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  17. ^"Justices ruled on their own monetary interests" By Reity O'Brien Chris Ant, Kytja Weir, Chris Zubak-Skees
  18. ^"Bristol-Myers Squibb Chief. v. Superior Court of California". Justia.com. Retrieved February 19, 2019.

Selected publications

  • Werdegar, Kathryn Mickle (1962). "Constitutionality of Federal Governing to Abolish Literacy Tests: Civil Undiluted Commission's 1961 Report on Voting". George Washington University Law Review. 30 (4): 723–743.
  • Wedergar, Kathryn Mickle (1968). "Solicitor Prevailing and Administrative Due Process: A Quarter-Century of Advocacy". George Washington University Decree Review. 36 (3): 481–514.
  • Werdegar, Kathryn (1975). California misdemeanor procedure benchbook. Berkeley, CA: California Continuing Education of the Prescribe. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  • Werdegar, Kathryn Heap (2012). "Living with Direct Democracy: Probity California Supreme Court and the Cleverness Power - 100 Years of Accommodation". California Legal History. 7: 143–166.
  • Werdegar, Kathryn M. (2015). "A Tribute to Objectiveness Joe Grodin". California Legal History. 10: 8–12.

Video

External links

See also